Skip to main content

Formal Complaint Against Officer Sh. Rajpal AETO (Enf) presently posted at Jagadhari

 SONEPAT TAX BAR ASSOCIATION

 Ms Kumud Singh

Addition ETC(CMG/HRMS/PMG/CFMS/Enf)

 Re:    Formal Complaint Against Officer Sh. Rajpal AETO (Enf), presently posted at Jagadhari.

 Most respectfully submitted as under:

 1.     We are writing to bring to your attention a recent incident in which we believe our rights as a citizen were violated by Officer Sh. Raj Pal. We are deeply concerned about the officer's conduct during the incident and subsequent refusal to provide necessary documents, as well as the threatening behaviour towards taxpayers.

 2.     On 07/06/2023, Officer Sh. Raj Pal, who recorded the statement in Mov-01 and handed over the copy without any description, his name, designation, and contact number, intercepted a vehicle coming from Delhi to Himachal Pradesh. An order in Mov-02 was issued for physical inspection of the goods, also without his own name and designation.

 3. When the owner taxpayer from Delhi called Officer Sh. Raj Pal to inquire about the reasons for asking to pay the penalty, he replied that the penalty must be paid before the goods would be released. The taxpayer deposited the penalty amount through DRC-03 under protest and got the goods released. However, the penalty was deposited under protest without the issue of Mov-07 and Mov-09.

Failure To Provide Documents:

4.     Despite our lawful request and in accordance with our rights as a taxpayer, we have not received any of the requested documents, including Mov-04, Mov-06, Mov-07, and the final order in Mov-09. This lack of transparency is deeply troubling and raises concerns about the officer's integrity & adherence to departmental policies and the law.

THREATENING BEHAVIOR:

5. Furthermore, Officer Sh. Raj Pal made alarming and threatening comments towards Taxpayer of Delhi, stating that "if you go for appeal, then I will impose a penalty time and again on your supply to Himachal Pradesh." Such actions undermine the public's trust in law enforcement and raise serious questions about the Officer's integrity and ability to carry out their duties impartially.

 6.  I kindly request a thorough investigation into this matter to address our concerns and uphold the principles of accountability and transparency. We believe that a prompt and impartial investigation is necessary to determine the culpability of Officer Sh. Raj Pal. We urge you to take appropriate action based on the findings of the investigation, which may include disciplinary measures if misconduct is confirmed.

 7.     I expect a response to this complaint within a reasonable time frame to ensure that this matter is addressed promptly and appropriately. Please acknowledge receipt of this complaint and provide us with a contact person's name and information to facilitate communication throughout the investigation.

 8.     We trust that you will take this matter seriously and are committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity and accountability among your officers. We appreciate your attention to this important issue and look forward to a timely resolution

 

Respectfully submitted

For Sonepat Tax Bar Association

CA R.Wadhwa

President

11/09/2023

 

Note: Although this is a specific complaint, it is concerning that incidents like this are frequent. It appears that the officers are pressuring the taxpayer to deposit the tax without issuing the necessary notices and orders. It is mandatory to upload these documents on the portal for submission of a reply by the taxpayer. This is a serious matter and should be treated as a representation.

 

Encl: The Screenshot of whatsapp chat and tweet posted, Copy of Mov-01, Mov-02

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Recommendations of the 57th GST Council Meeting

Recommendations of the 57th GST Council Meeting Held on October 8, 2026, New Delhi | Chaired by Union Finance Minister Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman[cite: 5] Major Highlights at a Glance Complete removal of arrest provisions under GST[cite: 5]. Prosecution threshold raised significantly from ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore[cite: 5]. General penalty amount reduced from ₹25,000 to ₹10,000[cite: 5]. In-principle approval for an optional scheme for small B2C businesses with turnover up to ₹5 crore[cite: 5]. Simplified registration for small sellers on e-commerce platforms[cite: 5]. A. Core Process Reforms 1. Registration Enhancements FORM GST REG-01 will be amended to include drop boxes for document selection, providing clarity to both taxpayers and officers[cite: 6]. Amendments to all registration particulars, except the Principal Place of Business (PPOB), will now be accepted automatically...

Advisory regarding confirmation of “Tax Liability Breakup, As Applicable” in GSTR-3B-reg Mar 16th, 2026

Advisory regarding confirmation of “Tax Liability Breakup, As Applicable” in GSTR-3B-reg Mar 16th, 2026 1. In terms of the provisions of Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, interest is payable where the tax liability pertaining to a previous tax period is discharged in a subsequent tax period. Accordingly, the tab “Tax Liability Breakup, As Applicable” in Form GSTR-3B is meant to capture the tax liability relating to supplies of previous tax periods which are being reported and discharged in the current tax period. 2. From the February 2026 tax period onwards, the GST Portal auto-populates the “Tax Liability Breakup, As Applicable” in GSTR-3B on the basis of the document dates of supplies reported in GSTR-1 / GSTR-1A / IFF, where such supplies pertain to any previous tax period but the corresponding tax liability is being discharged in the current period’s GSTR-3B. 3. Accordingly, from the February 2026 tax period, after offsetting the liability in GSTR-3...

57th GST Council Meeting on October 7, 2026

Agenda & Reforms: 57th GST Council Meeting October 7, 2026 | Transitioning to "Next-Gen GST" (GST 2.0) According to the document "The 57th GST Council Meeting on October 7.pdf" , the upcoming meeting on October 7, 2026, focuses heavily on GST 2.0 process reforms, compliance easing, and enforcement rationalization rather than tax rate revisions. Primary Issues and Proposals 1. Decriminalization and Arrest Powers Curbing Arrest Powers: The Council may curtail or remove Section 69 arrest powers for tax officials, shifting to technology-led detection rather than arrest-led deterrence. Routine disputes over valuation, classification, and technical compliance would be resolved via civil mechanisms, with strict criminal prosecution reserved for major fraud. Raising Prosecution Threshold: The financial threshold for launching criminal prosecution is proposed to rise from ₹1 cro...